Comments on: ITV may move from Freeview

By: Anonymous

Anonymous — Tue, 01 Sep 2009 21:53:41 +0000

The channels are just repeats that you know word for word ,a lot of the film's transmitted an hour later or earlier the next day or so anyway ..
Would not pay for sky so no extra revenue from me at those prices & stuck into a contract by them !
Cant they see people themselfs are having to cut corners this day & age with this climate .
NO THANKS

By: Anonymous

Anonymous — Mon, 31 Aug 2009 20:33:24 +0000

Buy Sky if ITV moves . Don't be daft why waste money?

By: Anonymous

Anonymous — Sat, 15 Aug 2009 15:16:31 +0000

ITV now have four channels and yet they continue to show the same rubbish over and over again. You would think with over 50 years of material to choose from we would get a varied mix of classic repeats and shows not seen on TV for decades. Not so!
I doubt very much people will be rushing to buy a satellite dish to see endless repeats of the Champions and Randall & Holkirk..
Come on ITV you are sitting on a gold mine of material. Tap into it

By: Anonymous

Anonymous — Tue, 04 Aug 2009 13:43:39 +0000

What about the likes of me who lives in a listed building so cannot have a Sky dish and in a pretty remote spot so no one will lay a cable to my home. Why should I be deprived of TV programes and sport just because of where I choose to live. It simply is not fair.

By: brian

brian — Wed, 29 Jul 2009 09:19:07 +0000

Are they Nuts ?

Advertisers will pay less if they move and I for one will not be blackmailed into getting Sky as I am very happy with the Freeview service .

I do view ITV2, ITV3 and ITV4 on occasions but I really don't like the idea that I should change all my units just to suit ITV.

If you recall before Freeview { ONdigital } ITV was making a fortune from their adverts so really its shows bad money management if they are struggling now - OFCOM should jump all over them.

By: Anonymous

Anonymous — Wed, 08 Jul 2009 23:13:26 +0000

The idea off freeview is that people who cannot afford to pay more money can have broad pick ofchannels to watch,other than just bbc1/2 itv1,@channel4/5 ,most have to get different arial,to receive digital,and really cannot afford sky .virgin.so please try to keep costs down for us ,old folk ,katy2katy ,

By: markandy

markandy — Sun, 05 Jul 2009 08:15:32 +0000

why don't they start by selling off the dead +1 channel they have for itv2 they could raise some money from that and let another station broadcast on freeview

By: Anonymous

Anonymous — Wed, 24 Jun 2009 09:19:52 +0000

It's absolutely rediculous.!If they leave the 8.5% of rural homes that only get half freeview,ie 18 or 20 channels public service muxes no commercial muxes A B OR C will recieve even less.!! CRAZY!!.

By: Anonymous

Anonymous — Mon, 22 Jun 2009 13:22:32 +0000

Most of the repeats on ITV3 & 4 were made 20-30 years ago.So have been paid for many times over since then.It only needs someone sitting in a control room pressing the 'play' button,to run both channels.So where's the huge cost involved?

By: Anonymous

Anonymous — Sat, 20 Jun 2009 05:27:13 +0000

Let's boycott ITV, use people power. I am sick and tired of being ripped off in the UK. We pay more in UK for almost everything, why pay for repeats on TV. Watch BBC, C4 and C5!
Power to the people!

By: Anonymous

Anonymous — Thu, 18 Jun 2009 15:14:58 +0000

Freeview and Freesat are the main vehicles for providing digital content after analogue is switched off. ITV are one of the main partners in both. If they now pull these channels they will alienate a lot of people – it would be tempting to avoid ITV1 in protest if they do this (or at least zap the adverts!)

By: Anonymous

Anonymous — Tue, 16 Jun 2009 22:25:49 +0000

I agree the amount of repeats on these channels is terrible,but ITV 2 really sucks big time!It's chav tv!Peter Andre and Katie Price,more Britain's got talent,It really is rubbish,I however am clearly in a minority.

By: Anonymous

Anonymous — Sun, 14 Jun 2009 13:37:40 +0000

So what! Its tripe anyway and no loss. ITV is going to the wall and no move to Sky can save it!

By: Anonymous

Anonymous — Sat, 13 Jun 2009 12:53:18 +0000

On 7 June The Sunday Times business section had an interview with Michael Grade, ITV Chairman, which suggested that ITV were having second thoughts about the decision to move away from Freeview. Hope so, as I quite enjoy some of the series repeats on ITV3.

By: Steve

Steve — Thu, 11 Jun 2009 18:54:46 +0000

As Freeview is at the centre of free digital TV I don't believe the ITV licence conditions would allow it to leave.

By: Anonymous

Anonymous — Wed, 10 Jun 2009 16:20:42 +0000

I for one don't have sky and had no desire to purchase it either. So if ITV does move I will purchase sky. DON'T THINK SO

By: Anonymous

Anonymous — Mon, 08 Jun 2009 05:21:45 +0000

i think it's a bad move cause half the channels on freeview are rubbish such as smile tv smile tv2 shopping channels rabbit-chat and so on alot have freeview and buying freeview each day and itv has some good things on itv2 is ok but itv2 is repets you should look into putting more channels on worth watching ie music channels film channels and take the rubbish one off mark 31 midlands

By: Anonymous

Anonymous — Fri, 05 Jun 2009 19:01:17 +0000

free view will go down the pan if they remove itv1 ITV2, ITV3 and ITV4 from the Freeview and people may by sky digital

By: Gareth S

Gareth S — Fri, 05 Jun 2009 09:53:42 +0000

Get rid of ITV 3 and ITV4, as they are just repeats. Keep ITV 2 as during the day granted is mainly repeats but in the evening you can get some quality telly. so by getting rid of 2 channels, ITV will be saving millions.

By: Anonymous

Anonymous — Thu, 04 Jun 2009 21:46:31 +0000

If they move to a platform with half the potential audience,maybe the advertisers will demand to pay less.Thus ITV will be shooting themselves in the foot.Why not just have 1 or 2 less channels,they are mostly repeats anyway.